Leadership of the Loudest

The end of 2010 saw the positioning of political parties, and their leaders, to both influence their supporters and set up the game for 2011. Flipping the channels becomes a blurred sequence of exaggerated claims, positions, accusations, and words that are, for the most part, void of any useful movement on any issue. Those inside the political circus are used to this dance of the elephants and know that the real evidence of leadership is not in the media posturing, but in the one-one and small group conferences that may result in some actual benefit to the country. Like boxers in the first few rounds of a title fight, supposed leaders dance around, jabbing here and there, hoping to touch a soft spot that can become leverage later when the serious in-fighting must occur. Unfortunately a large percent of the population does not live in Washington nor do they participate in those faux media minutes. They do, however, often mistake a loud and persistent voice for truth and urgency. Slowly over the years it seems the line, between news as accurate retelling and news as media showmanship, has dissolved. Add to the torrent of major networks the chatter of cable channels and now the endless bits of commentary, often without personal knowledge, on the Internet, and leadership is lost in the camouflage of chaos.
By contrast it is interesting to see the influence of Aung San Suu Kyi, who speaks quietly but clearly, and who faces brute power with fearless, focused purpose. Are leaders those who rise, at no small threat to themselves, to follow the quiet voice of truth and reason, or are leaders those who are pushed from behind by those whose self-interest is undisclosed but driven beyond ethics. Beware those who lead only to preserve their positions, and honor those who face any consequence to bring truth to power. Leadership power is evident when people follow because they experience integrity, purpose and a vision that goes beyond self-interest.